Adversarial vs Inquisitorial Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2000 words

Adversarial vs Inquisitorial - Essay Example The debate constitutes finding out the guilt or innocence of a party in the case. Somehow, the adversarial system entails few merits and disadvantages as well. The first of the two advantages is that the judge reserves the right to comment until the two parties exhaust their arguments on presented evidence. The second advantage is that such an opportunity accorded to the judge makes his or her role appear neutral. The system requires the judge to preserve judgement until after completion of scrutiny of evidence. Brooks identifies demerits including among others the process of gathering evidence is a responsibility of the two parties in the case. In most cases, they are not equal. Similarly, the two parties in the case only present evidence favourable to the case they hold. The inquisitorial system of justice is the commonest procedure of approach in many civil jurisdictions. The system involves the judge in preparing evidence along with the support of the police. The judge also plays a role in determining ways through which the case would appear in court. The legal jargon for the prosecutor is then Crown. The definition leads to the Crown representing the people of Canada. On the other hand, the defence lawyer is the advocate for the accused. The function of the judge should centre on finding the truth by perusing presented evidence proving either the innocence or guilt of one of the parties. As opposed to being a referee and an arbiter like in the adversarial system, the judge in the inquisitorial system takes the roles of both the prosecutor and judge. Over the past few years, other countries applying the adversarial system continue to make greater steps compared to Canada in incorporating inquisitors into their systems. Other countries in Europe including France apply the inquisitorial system. The system tackles the determination of guilt or innocence in a different manner. Because, other users continue to incorporate inquisitors is reason enough

Riordan Gap Analysis Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words

Riordan Gap Analysis - Essay Example However, the company can use this as a opportunity to better manage its operations. It can give different compensation packages and work schedules to different groups of people and take advantage of the situation by improving its production, The second issue that the company is facing that there are several late consignments in the last few months. There is some problems in the operations management of the company. The company can again use different sets of people to solve the problem. By allocating different work schedules and holidays, the company can operate in holidays because one or two groups will always be present to work because different cultures have different holidays falling on different days, months and years. This way the company can reduce the problem of late consignments. The third issue for the company is lack of qualified resources. However, the company can train them to achieve great benefits out of them as they would command fewer salaries than qualified resources. Hence, the company can improve its profitability. There would be different interests for management, government and employees. The management would want high productivity and achievement of overall vision. The government would want the organization to follow all rules and regulations and to respect the natural environment. However, the employees would want better conditions of work and high salaries. These interest might conflict with each other and the company will have to choose a framework to decide which aims to follow and which to ignore depending on the firm’s own value network. For example, paying high salaries to worker would mean that the company’s vision of being a profitable firm would suffer. Hence, the company will have to make a decision on what is best for the firm to follow. The company would want to achieve workplace harmony. This means that no culture is conflict with the company’s polices and that there is no infighting within the organization. The